The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
BOOK REVIEW: “Invisible Influence: The hidden forces that shape behavior” by Jonah Berger

BOOK REVIEW: “Invisible Influence: The hidden forces that shape behavior” by Jonah Berger

July 28, 2017

Without our realizing it, other people’s behavior has a huge influence on everything we do at every moment of our lives, from the mundane to the momentous occasion. Even strangers have a startling impact on our judgments and decisions: our attitudes toward a welfare policy shift if we’re told it is supported by Democrats versus Republicans (even though the policy is the same in both cases).

But social influence doesn’t just lead us to do the same things as others. In some cases we conform, or imitate others around us. But in other cases we diverge, or avoid particular choices or behaviors because other people are doing them. In Invisible Influence, Jonah Berger integrates research and thinking from business, psychology, and social science to focus on the subtle, invisible influences behind our choices as individuals. By understanding how social influence works, we can decide when to resist and when to embrace it—and how we can use this knowledge to make better-informed decisions and exercise more control over our own behavior.

There is only one place we don’t see social influence—ourselves.

Drawing on ingenious research and scientific experiments, Jonah Berger picks up where his Contagious: Why Things Catch On (2013) left off to explore why we act as we do, politically, socially, and economically—often influenced by social forces and contexts we are unconscious of.

Jonah Berger started studying social influence by bicycling around Palo Alto looking for BMWs which he learned were more likely to be parked near dentist offices and gourmet groceries.  He tucked a questionnaire under the windshield wiper of each BMW he found. Respondents were asked to answer each question twice—once for themselves and once for someone else they knew who had bought a BMW.  “In addition to standard factors like price, gas mileage, and reliability, the survey also asked about more social influences.  Did their friends’ opinions affect their decisions?  What about whether the car was associated with cool or high-status people?” (Invisible Influence, p.3)

Results:  Social influence as a purchase motive vanished when respondents held up a mirror to their own actions. (Berger explains the same applies to clothing, voting and even courteous driving.) People could see social influence affecting others’ behavior, but not their own.

Invisible Influence is about the simple, subtle and often surprising ways others affect our behavior. It organizes the experimental results of the science of social behavior into five insights, each of which has implications for marketers.  The five insights are:

  1. We humans imitate each other.
  2. At the same time we are driven to be different.
  3. How the competing desires to imitate and to be unique play out depends on the context and who the “other” group is.
  4. The competing desires to imitate and to be unique mean the most successful new products are similar but just different enough.
  5. People perform simple tasks better when others are present but perform complex tasks better when alone.

Each of these insights has implications for marketers.  Here are some of Berger’s examples:

  1. We humans imitate each other. Putting social influence to work:
  • Rewards and punishments are not as effective at influencing behavior by modeling.
  • When waiters at high-end restaurants repeat each diner’s order in elegant and appetizing detail, not only does the perceived value of the meal increase but also the diner’s appetite, and the tip increases as much as 70%.
  • Nothing draws a crowd like a crowd. For example, Pat’s Philly Cheesesteak usually has a line blocks long while the other restaurants nearby offer sandwiches that are just as good and less expensive (without the wait!)
  1. We are driven to be different. Putting social influence to work:
  • People like to be included in the elite group of likers. When the crowd of likers of a rock band gets too big they say, “I like their old stuff” to be included in a more elite group.  They want it to be known that they liked the band before most others did.  Sometimes a mere hint that something is gaining steam is enough to make some people dislike it.
  • Distinction helps explain the adoption of high-end gadgets. There are often rewards for being different.  What makes you stand out?  The fundamental question is, “Who are you?”
  • Uniqueness is not wrong or right. It’s a preference derived from context. Some contexts encourage differentiation, e.g.:
  • Working class people prefer similarity.
  • People from middle-class backgrounds avoid picking popular items.
  • People from working class backgrounds don’t have an aversion to fitting in. They pick popular items over less popular items. Less rather than more difference is preferred.
  • East Asian cultures foster more fitting in, while American culture rewards individualism.
  1. How the competing desires to imitate and to be unique play out depends on who the “other” group is. Putting social influence to work:
  • The $300,000 watch that doesn’t tell time. At 2008 Baselworld (the watch industry’s annual international expo) visitors were treated to a special announcement. Renowned Swiss watchmaker Romain Jerome was releasing something unique.  The watch was called Day & Night.  It was made in part from steel salvaged from the Titanic and it contained not one but two separate tourbillions designed to combat the negative effects of gravity on watch accuracy.  One noteworthy detail: the watch didn’t tell time.  This is how it was marketed, “With no display for the hours, minutes or seconds, the Day & Night offers a new way of measuring time, splitting the universe of time into two fundamentally opposing sections: day versus night.”  The watch sold out in less than forty-eight hours.  People will clamor to be part of an elite group.  Only a very few can afford something so expensive and nearly afunctional.
  • Honda designed the Element to appeal to twenty-somethings and their ads reflected that. The ads included outdoor fun and young people having great times together.  Honda pitched the Element as a dorm room on wheels that could haul bikes and surfboards, but research showed it also appealed to thirty and forty-somethings who found it perfect for hauling around children and groceries.  Senior citizens loved its spacious interior and low price tag.  So, the Element stopped signaling “hip” and started communicating a more inclusive message.
  • Rather than preaching about the ill effects of binge drinking, a more effective campaign featured a poster with a geeky looking guy holding a drink. Students who saw the poster reported drinking 50% less alcohol.
  1. The competing desires to imitate and to be unique mean the most successful new products are similar but just different enough. Success hinges on consumer perception. If a new product is too similar to what’s already out there, people won’t want to spend the extra money to replace it.  If it’s too radical, consumers perceive other issues and they don’t know how to categorize it.  Putting social influence to work:
  • In 1899 a clever inventor added a fake horse head to the horseless carriage to help consumers feel more comfortable with the idea of the radical invention.
  • TiVo made their digital appliance look similar to a VCR even though it didn’t need to be nearly as big.
  • Design can be used to make incremental innovations feel more novel. The first iMac was shaped like a gumdrop and came in colors like tangerine and strawberry.
  1. People perform simple tasks better when others are present but perform complex tasks alone. We are constantly shaped by the people around us. Putting social influence to work:
  • Different messages were given to heads of households to encourage lower energy consumption. The socially responsible tact didn’t work. Neither did the message stating how much money consumers would save each month.  The message that ended up working was one that stated how many of their neighbors were saving energy.  Social comparison information motivates consumers to change behavior.
  • Social comparisons can be a powerful motivating force but if not carefully designed, social comparisons can lead people to quit, especially if the “game” is set up as “winner take all.” Only the top contenders can get excited about that setup.
  • In the 1930’s the US began to develop public housing as part of the New Deal. The National Industrial Recovery Act directed the Public Works Administration to clear the slums and construct low-income dwellings. The first of fifty such projects was in Atlanta in 1936. Scientists began to study the effects of randomly giving some families the opportunity to move to better neighborhoods, while others stayed put.  Moving to lower-poverty areas improved overall well-being.  Children were more likely to attend college and go on to live in better neighborhoods. They emulated their peers.

Reading tip: Keep an open mind.  We are all subject to social influence.  Understanding how, gives guidance on how we can create effective marketing programs.

Dr. Karl Hellman is President of Resultrek Inc., a marketing and sales consulting firm. 

Related Posts

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

B2B Marketing /

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

B2C Marketing /

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

“The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

Book Reviews /

“The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

‹ “The Trust Gap Diagnostic” – Elsie Maio › BOOK REVIEW: “Simple Rules: How to Thrive in a Complex World” by Donald Sull and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar
  • “Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken
  • OP-ED: “Autopsy Of a Brand: Tesla” – George Tsakraklides
  • “The 5th P is Purpose” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “The CEO-as-Brand Era: How Leadership Ego is Fueling Tesla’s Meltdown” – Ilenia Vidili
  • “The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Questions for the New Year” – John Hagel
  • “Enlightened Management – An Interview with Gabriele Carboni”
  • “If you’re not thinking segments, you’re not thinking” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “Does Marketing Need Curtailment for the Sake of Sustainability?” – Philip Kotler
  • ‘Social profit orientation’ can help companies and nonprofits alike do more good in the world by Leonard L. Berry, Lerzan Aksoy, and Tracey Danaher
  • “Understanding Hallyu: The Impact of Korean Pop Culture” by Sanya Anand and David Seyheon Baek
  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Ethics and AI: Policies for Governance and Regulation” – Aryssa Yoon, Christian Sarkar, and Philip Kotler
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti
  • “ChatGPT could be a game-changer for marketers, but it won’t replace humans any time soon” – Omar H. Fares
  • “If Your Brand Comes Before Your Category, You’re Doing It Wrong” – Eddie Yoon, Nicolas Cole, Christopher Lochhead

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • March 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy