The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“Does CX still matter?” – Jef Teugels

“Does CX still matter?” – Jef Teugels

May 14, 2021

The Search for a Unified View on CX

While many companies and organizations claim to have the universal definition of customer experience, the reality is different. This article reviews Larissa Becker and Elina Jaakkola’s (2020) research, which examined 136 articles about CX in eight literature fields. [i]

In my article “Customer Experience: A Tale of Two Opposing Views” (2019), I explained that despite a consensus between practitioners and scholars that a favorable CX positively impacts business outcomes, the CX concept remains foggy.

One looks at CX through one of two lenses. The organizational lens assumes that companies can design experiences and that all customers will perceive stimuli alike. The customer lens ascertains that firms cannot deliver value since the customer is always a co-creator of value. While the former focuses on organizational structure, strategy, and customer-employee interactions, the latter considers individual customer journeys, cognition, affect, and senses.

Figure 1: The CX Bifurcation

Becker and Jaakkola acknowledge the duality of CX by calling it a response to either managerial stimuli or consumption processes and call out the lack of a unified view on customer experience. The researchers rightfully see the absence of a shared understanding of CX as a challenge for theory development.

And for the practitioner who loathes theory, I’d like to quote Clayton Christensen: “We use theories in our daily lives, whether we want it or not, and whether we are aware of it or not” and John Maynard Keynes: “Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually slaves of some defunct economist.” [ii]

So yes, hindering theory development hinders the practitioner. Consequently, the researchers have a hard time providing the CX manager with the meaningful implications she seeks to achieve superior customer experiences.

I, for one, do not want to be the slave of some defunct CX guru, nor do I want to be exempt from intellectual influences as a practical man. If you don’t want to be either, then keep reading.

Becker and Jaakkola try to resolve the paradoxes and dilemmas in the current customer experience literature. Their objective to develop a consolidative tactic to CX research leads to four essential premises of customer experience. The researchers suggest these premises are cross-contextual and apply to any setting.

They come up with the Theoretical Map of Customer Experience, which I prefer to call the CX Bandwidth.

Figure 2: The CX Bandwidth

What the map does, is not so much consolidate two paradigms but fill the gap between the organizational and the customer lens. The chasm is not an empty pace but a bandwidth where customer experience phenomena occupy a specific area, as the combination of figures one and two illustrates.

Figure 3: The CX Phenomena on the CX Spectrum

Figure 3 clarifies why there is no consensus on a definition of customer experience—some view CX as a characteristic of a product and others as an individual’s subjective perception.

Toward a Unified View on CX

Seeing CX as responses to managerial stimuli or looking through the organizational lens assumes company control over CX. Seeing through the customer lens or CX as responses to consumption processes acknowledges multiple stakeholders and experience-inducing triggers beyond a company’s management.

In their effort to produce a universal definition of CX, Becker and Jaakkola suggest defining customer experience as “non-deliberate, spontaneous responses to particular stimuli.” The researchers arrive at this definition by separating the stimuli and the subsequent conscious evaluation of the customer’s reactions from the customer experience.

The proposed definition is eerily similar to that of emotion, as defined by the American Psychology Association; “A complex reaction pattern, involving experiential, behavioral, and physiological elements, by which an individual attempts to deal with a personally significant matter or event.” [iii]

In simpler terms, an emotion is a basal response in our brain that sparks a biochemical reaction in our body and changes our physical state.  They are coded in our genes and are quasi-universal. [iv] [v]

Becker and Jaakkola’s proposed definition of CX matches the more straightforward explanation above since it does not deal with the triggers or sensemaking of the responses. It is void of intention and preexisting conditions; it separates emotions from feelings, which are, in reality, two different yet linked phenomena.

A feeling is “A self-contained phenomenal experience. Feelings are subjective, evaluative, and independent of the sensations, thoughts, or images evoking them.” [vi]  Feelings are mental pictures of what happens in our body when we experience an emotion and are subjective, based on our personal experiences, beliefs, world views, and memories. Unlike emotions, which are quasi-universal, feelings are cultural.

In separating feeling from emotion, the researchers bring awareness to another confusion concerning the nature of customer experiences. Marketers and marketing researchers think that good experiences are by definition memorable or extraordinary. They refer to the nature of their offerings rather than to customers’ evaluations.

While the marketer sees her offering as extraordinary, the customer’s perception of it can be very weak or very strong.  Also, a customer can have a fantastic experience as a response to an ordinary offering.  The proof of the eating is in the pudding, after all.

I find the definition of CX proposed by Becker and Jaakkola too simplistic as a definition because it reduces CX to a basal response to any trigger ─which can be a person’s thought or an external event─  without the feeling that describes the bodily reaction. However, I believe it is the perfect starting point to understanding the customer experience, be it as a researcher or a practitioner.

Another merit of the researchers is their visualization of the CX bandwidth, the triggers that occupy its frequency range, and how service design bridges the schools of thought.

What’s more, Becker and Jaakkola propose a conceptual CX framework that puts the opposing views on CX into one dynamic complex system, acknowledging the limited control of a company over the system. The researchers designed the framework based on the four fundamental premises they formulate.

Becker and Jaakkola’s Fundamental Premises

Table 1: Fundamental Premises. Becker, L. and Jaakkola, E., (2020).

Premise 1.a. “Customer experience comprises customers’ non-deliberate, spontaneous responses and reactions to offering-related stimuli along the customer journey.”
Premise 1.b. “Customer experience ranges from ordinary to extraordinary, representing the intensity of customer responses to stimuli.”
Premise 2.a. “Customer experience stimuli reside within and outside firm-controlled touchpoints and can be viewed from multiple levels of aggregation.”
Premise 2.b. “Customer experience stimuli and their interconnections affect [the] customer experience in a dynamic manner.”
Premise 3 “Customer experience is subjective and context-specific because responses to offering-related stimuli and their evaluative outcomes depend on customer, situational, and sociocultural contingencies.”
Premise 4 “Firms cannot create the customer experience, but they can monitor, design, and manage a range of stimuli that affect such experiences.”

 

Becker and Jaakkola’s fundamental premises underwrite CX as a dynamic complex system that reaches beyond a firm’s control. The researchers ask two pertinent questions:

  1. How can a company design touchpoints that are adaptive to external touchpoint stimuli?
  2. How can a company influence customers’ responses to external touchpoint stimuli?

I agree with Becker and Jaakkola to ground customer experience management models in research (and practice) in a sophisticated understanding of experience. This agreement explains why I see the researchers’ proposed definition as a perfect starting point for both the scholar and the practitioner.

CX as a Dynamic Complex System

What Becker and Jaakkola see as their conceptual framework of customer experience, I see as a to-do list for every CX practitioner. Trying to emerge a good customer experience is not enough. Identifying and naming the intended customer experience is what matters. Achieving the intended CX in the customer’s perception is the name of the game. The researchers’ framework sheds light on how to be in pole position as a practitioner and researcher.

Figure 4: CX as a Dynamic Complex System

Conclusion

Despite the perception of speed we have in our so-called VUCA world, customer experience as a concept is relatively young. Its study and practice bifurcated at one point leading to two primary schools of thought. Neither school encompasses the full spectrum of CX.

Becker and Jaakkola set out to reconcile the two dominant views on customer experience. They managed to produce four premises and a framework that allows both the academic and the practitioner to take the next step.

The primary outcome of the researchers’ work is the identification of the CX bandwidth and the phenomena that lie in its frequency range. Their best advice is to ground a sophisticated understanding of experience before venturing into customer experience management models.

Jef Teugels is the CEO of MarketCulture Europe. He assists entrepreneurs and organizational leaders in developing and realizing sustainable growth.

REFERENCES

[i] Becker, L. and Jaakkola, E., 2020. Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), pp.630-648.

[ii] https://silberzahnjones.com/2011/09/05/why-theory-matters/

[iii] https://dictionary.apa.org/emotion

[iv] Ekman, Paul; Cordaro, Daniel (20 September 2011). “What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic”. Emotion Review. 3 (4): 364–370. doi:10.1177/1754073911410740

[v] Plutchik R (2002). “Nature of emotions”. American Scientist. 89 (4): 349. doi:10.1511/2001.28.739

[vi] https://dictionary.apa.org/feeling

 

 

 

Related Posts

“Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso

Customer Culture /

“Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso

“The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du

Customer Engagement /

“The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du

“What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner

Customer Experience /

“What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner

‹ “Sunshine on a Cloudy Day” – An Interview with Sunthalpy’s Carlos Omar Suárez › “Narratives Shape Our Emotions” – John Hagel
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy