The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“GE Digital Drives Sales Growth with CRM” – Matthew Hellman

“GE Digital Drives Sales Growth with CRM” – Matthew Hellman

March 2, 2018

The marketer’s greatest weapon is data – when used in the right way it enables sales and marketing to strike gold by honing in on the most valuable customers, and focus campaign efforts, content, and experiences tailored directly to the right customers in the way that makes the most sense for them.

At GE Digital – we found that we could do just this, by scoring our customers based on their activity and interactions, ultimately helping us find the customers that would deliver the greatest return for our marketing spend, pinpoint the leads that matter most, and build a more human interaction with our target audiences.

The Challenge

Our sales teams were faced with too many leads in regional queues and had a tough time deciphering leads worth pursuing from those that weren’t. Sales was also having a hard time finding top priority leads and wanted better intelligence on the urgency of each lead’s inquiry – understanding the value of a lead involved clicking into the lead object, which was too time consuming and decreased sales productivity.

We based our previous strategy for defining valueable leads on standard scoring best practices where a lead would reach marketing qualified lead (MQL) status after acquiring 100 points assigned based on their engagements with calls to action (CTAs), such as buttons on emails that allow you to register for a webinar or download a whitepaper.

Our previous model was tough to maintain since it was based on forms, downloads, clicks, and opens. These made it time-consuming to update via traditional marketing activities as we often had new web page launches, content releases, and omni-channel campaigns. Moreover, the experience lacked a truly personal experience that provided our customers with content that was aligned with their desired outcomes.

To top it off, from an internal perspective, ensuring a successful lead lifecycle setup required many steps and the inclusion of a whole host of stakeholders across Digital Marketing, Revenue Marketing, Inside Sales, Marketing Operations, and IT. A revised strategy and structure would necessitate the creation of a thorough change management program to secure buy-in and educate users.

The Solution

As a large company, the process of identifing customers well-suited for our offering can be incredibly complicated. In order to sift through the thousands of leads we gather, we implemented a new model that combined demographic, firmographic and behavioral data to not only assign leads, but prioritize them as well.

We implemented this priority scoring model based on demographic and interest rank to get leads with the highest engagement that best matched our target personas into the hands of sales faster, allowing them to focus on the leads that matter most and which are more likely to convert (all delivered to sales through the tool they use most – Salesforce.com).

Inside Sales is now able to sort for and find urgent customers faster based on engagement and persona (tackling the highest priority leads first – from P0 (top priority) to P3 (lowest priority). Marketing and Inside Sales now speak the same language easily and effectively with quick communication based on the priority score. With an addition of a “p-score” field on the sales queue, our teams have a quick visual of the types of leads in the pipeline without having to click to each individual lead.

For Marketing, we have simpler analytics on what is working and what isn’t in our lead scoring model, and we can invest in the highest conversion lead types by priority. In addition, our communication with sales, and the easy agile setup of this model, allows us to make more informed lead scoring updates quickly.

We also implemented a Sales Insights strategy so sales can prioritize and view all key engagements by customer (what campaigns and collateral are “touching” each lead). Customers now get what they need faster as we can determine the best fit based on their persona – creating a more useful and human experience. This also allows us to provide better insights to our Digital Marketing, Revenue Marketing and IT teams.

Top-of-Funnel Velocity

Initial results have proven that our new model has been able to drive more valueable experiences for our customers, and better leads for our sales team. With better data on our lead’s preferences, we now know who to target and how best to engage with our potential customers.

To determine the effectiveness and impact of priority scoring we analyzed the following:

  • Top of funnel velocity – to show the time it takes for a quality lead to reach our sales team.
  • Sales stage conversion – to show overall impact and quality of leads through the buyer’s journey.
  • Bottom of funnel deal velocity – to measure how fast we are closing opportunities once the right lead is with the right sales team.

Our analysis showed that when implemented we could identify priority leads much faster and hand those leads off to the sales teams 4X faster than before which means sales can reach the right people at the right time, with more personalized content, faster.

Sales Stage Conversion

Digging deeper into our systems we traced some of the leads through their lifecycle (before and after the new model was put in place) to get a sense for how the system chose to prioritize some leads over others, and tweaked the model where it made sense. We spent weeks continuously reviewing and tweaking our lead scoring model with a cross-functional committee to make sure we were scoring appropriately based on not only what we could offer to the market, but also based on trends we saw with our target segments.

The resulting model produced improved sales stage conversion rates with a 128% increase in converting marketing qualified leads into inside sales “accepts.” Our sales teams were accepting marketing leads at a higher rate because they viewed the leads as stronger matches with what GE Digital could offer. We saw similar increases in conversions for both “inside sales accepted” to “inside sales qualified” (17% increase), as well as “sales accepted” to “sales qualified” (3%) – again suggesting that the model is bringing in stronger and higher quality leads to our sales teams.

The model is so accurate at capturing and managing good leads that we can see a positive correlation in the number of successful sales and the speed at which these leads are closing after being passed off to the sales team. Since the model automatically prioritizes accounts that fit the GE target account, more sales activities are aligned with our business strategy.

Bottom-of-Funnel Velocity

Sales has since shared that the logic and structure behind this model has been instrumental for them to have more meaningful and tailored lead assignment. When high priority leads are given to sales, deals close on average 78% faster than before.

Marketing operations and analytics have become pivotal in how we identify and interact with our customers. We have seen that through scoring we can not only focus our resources on the most important leads, but we can target those leads with the right content at the right time to make sure that we are delivering an experience that adds the most value to those customers when they need it. For us, delivering “humanized” marketing not only creates personal and valuable experiences for our customers, but it helps us focus limited resources on a few key leads to gain the greatest possible return.

Matthew Hellman, Head of Marketing Operations & Analytics for GE Digital

Related Posts

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

B2B Marketing /

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso

Customer Engagement /

“Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

Customer Experience /

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

‹ “The CMO Survey: How Does Your Company Develop New Marketing Capabilities?” – Christine Moorman › “3 Big Ideas from Amazon and the Implications for Marketing” – Frank Grillo
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar
  • “Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken
  • OP-ED: “Autopsy Of a Brand: Tesla” – George Tsakraklides
  • “The 5th P is Purpose” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “The CEO-as-Brand Era: How Leadership Ego is Fueling Tesla’s Meltdown” – Ilenia Vidili
  • “The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Questions for the New Year” – John Hagel
  • “Enlightened Management – An Interview with Gabriele Carboni”
  • “If you’re not thinking segments, you’re not thinking” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “Does Marketing Need Curtailment for the Sake of Sustainability?” – Philip Kotler
  • ‘Social profit orientation’ can help companies and nonprofits alike do more good in the world by Leonard L. Berry, Lerzan Aksoy, and Tracey Danaher
  • “Understanding Hallyu: The Impact of Korean Pop Culture” by Sanya Anand and David Seyheon Baek
  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Ethics and AI: Policies for Governance and Regulation” – Aryssa Yoon, Christian Sarkar, and Philip Kotler
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti
  • “ChatGPT could be a game-changer for marketers, but it won’t replace humans any time soon” – Omar H. Fares
  • “If Your Brand Comes Before Your Category, You’re Doing It Wrong” – Eddie Yoon, Nicolas Cole, Christopher Lochhead

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • March 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy