The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“Marketing and The CMO Survey” – An Interview with Christine Moorman

“Marketing and The CMO Survey” – An Interview with Christine Moorman

July 28, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-07-27 at 11.59.22 PMChristine Moorman is the T. Austin Finch Professor, Sr. of Business Administration at The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Professor Moorman’s research focuses on understanding the nature and effects of information utilization and learning activities by consumers, managers, organizations, and financial markets. She has examined these issues in contexts ranging from innovation, marketing research relationships, networks and interfirm alliances, and the impact of public policy and regulation. Professor Moorman is the author of “Strategy from the Outside In: Profiting from Customer Value” with George S. Day, which was awarded the 2011 Berry Book prize for the best book in the field of marketing. Professor Moorman is the founding and current Director of The CMO Survey. The Marketing Journal will provide periodical updates from Professor Moorman as future surveys are administered.

Can you start by telling us about the CMO Survey – it’s purpose, and when you started it?
I started the survey in August 2008 and have administered it twice a year since. Our mission is to collect and disseminate the opinions of top marketers in order to predict the future of markets, track marketing excellence, and improve the value of marketing in firms and society. The CMO Survey covers a range of strategic marketing questions, many of which are forward-looking.  We repeat questions to observe trends over time. Given it is a non-commercial service dedicated to the field of marketing, the survey is an objective source of information about marketing—we cover the good, the bad, and the ugly.

I started the survey because I felt there was a lack of attention to what marketing leaders know and have to offer one another, the profession, and the broader business world. By collecting their opinions, their practices, and their spending behaviors, we have been able to get important insights into how to improve the contributions of marketing.

What are some of the more interesting insights you’ve observed lately?
One topic I’ve written about on our blog is the Social Media Spend-Impact Disconnect. What we mean by this is exactly like it sounds like: social media is not delivering the goods.

Social media spending is expected to climb to 20.9 percent share of marketing budgets in the next five years. This share was only 5.6 percent in 2009. What is striking, however, is that only 3.4 percent of marketing leaders report that social media contributes very highly to firm performance; 40 percent report a below average contribution. This is worrisome.Screen Shot 2016-07-28 at 12.10.15 AM

We see that hot topics like social media are often disjointed from the firm’s strategy.  Many companies do not have clear objectives for their social media activities. Without objectives, what should be measured? The best social media activities have a clear objective and measure performance against this objective. However, companies often don’t clearly specify their objectives and so strategy and measures are not clear.

We also see cultural challenges. As companies build a presence in social media, they often seek outside agencies to help. In fact, marketing leaders report that 20 percent of their social media activities are performed by outside agencies. One challenge is that old “not invented here” syndrome—where companies fail to accept new ideas developed outside their borders—could be keeping this external expertise from making its best contributions.

What about mobile marketing?
The CMO Survey reports that companies currently spend 6% of marketing budgets on mobile marketing and that this investment level is expected to increase to 15.6% over the next three years. This 160% increase reflects a growing reliance on mobile to interact with customers where they look for information and make purchases. Companies hope to reach customers closer to the time of purchase in order to make them aware of offerings, deals, and additional information that may help close more sales.

Despite these hopes, marketing leaders report only modest success in the impact of mobile marketing activities. When asked to rate the performance of their company’s mobile marketing activities on a scale from 1-7 where 1=poorly and 7=excellent, the figure below shows the current gap with only customer engagement breaching the halfway mark, while delivering your brand message, customer acquisition, customer retention, sales, and profits all falling below average.

Screen Shot 2016-07-28 at 12.29.56 AM

What is critical is that companies ask themselves a few important questions before embarking on their mobile expansion plans: Who is the customer? How do they shop? Is this a high-involvement purchase? For example, a middle-aged car buyer will spend very little time searching on a mobile device. Like any channel, mobile must suit your offering and your customer.

What about tracking and privacy?  How are leading marketers balancing the short-term pressure from sales with their long-term objectives?
The CMO Survey reported that 40 percent of companies use customer information collected online for targeting purposes and 88.5 percent of Chief Marketing Officers expect this practice to increase over time. At the same time, CMOs have very low levels of concern about how the use of online customer data infringes upon privacy.  These numbers are not reflected in the marketplace. For example, a survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that 86 percent of Internet users have taken steps to remove or mask their digital footprints — ranging from clearing cookies to encrypting their email. Fifty-five percent have gone even further to avoid being observed by specific people, organizations or the government.

Clearly, customers and marketers are not on the same page. It is time for companies and industries to proactively create strategies, systems and standards for interacting with customers online.  Companies should let customers decide how much they want to share in return for more customization and targeting. In a strong relationship, customers will likely disclose a great deal because they trust companies and understand the value of sharing information about their preferences and behavior. Think reciprocity. When this happens, it’s a win for customers and a win for companies. It is also a win for society because commercial relationships are based on respect and reciprocity, not ignorance and secrecy.

Thanks, Professor Moorman.  I expect our readers will download The CMO Survey reports, and stay tuned for updates.

The CMO Survey Highlights and Insights Feb 2016 from christinemoorman
Interview by Christian Sarkar

Related Posts

“Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam

Analytics /

“Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam

“Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr

B2B Marketing /

“Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr

“The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du

B2C Marketing /

“The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du

‹ VIDEO: Philip Kotler on “How to Grow through Marketing” › “Aligning Sales and Marketing Strategy: The Customer Value Imperative” – Javed Matin
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy