The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“Outcome-Driven Venturing: Build the right solutions—and build them right” – Noel Sobelman and Tony Ulwick

“Outcome-Driven Venturing: Build the right solutions—and build them right” – Noel Sobelman and Tony Ulwick

March 25, 2021

The holy grail of innovation in the twenty-first century is customer insight. Designing products and solutions from the customer-in, rather than the product-out. Technical specialists from engineers to actuaries have started to learn how to investigate customer needs and preferences before they spend time designing products that the market does not want. However, our application of the science of customer insight has often lagged behind this enthusiastic embrace of outside-in thinking. That’s where ‘outcome driven venturing’ that focuses on the customer’s “job to be done” fits in.

People buy products and services to get a “job” done. This Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) theory has been successfully put into practice by countless companies over the last 20+ years. Through these successes, we have learned that customers can state the metrics they use to measure success when getting a job done—and that these metrics, when defined as desired outcomes, bring science to the front-end of the innovation process. With these advancements, companies can know with greater certainty whether a concept will win in the marketplace before development even begins—and invest its resources only in high potential solutions. In other words, companies have learned how to apply Jobs Theory, using Outcome Driven Innovation (ODI) to consistently ensure they “build the right solutions”.

Design thinking, lean startup, and Agile methods have emerged over the last 12 years as the predominant approaches for development and the back end of innovation. Thanks to thought leaders like Michael Tushman, Charles O’Reilly, Steve Blank, Eric Reis, Alex Osterwalder, Brant Cooper, and others, we now have a methodology and growing toolset for streamlining development and go-to-market processes. These lean innovation concepts help us “build the solutions right”.

Combining downstream lean methods with upstream JTBD practices creates a robust, end-to-end growth formula. This helps take the guesswork out of needs discovery and prioritization for, ideating, incubating, and scaling new ventures. Through this combined synergy, companies seeking to create new ventures are now able to build the right solutions AND build them right.


Combining JTBD with Lean Innovation

Lean innovation teaches us how to run experiments with customers to test the most critical unknowns in a transformative new idea. Techniques such as empathy interviews and ethnography are used to surface the unmet needs of target customers and to continuously seek evidence that the customer values the solution to the problem. In addition, companies start with the riskiest, highest impact business model assumptions to learn as quickly and as cheaply as possible. These experiments start early in the innovation process and continue through development, as teams validate the attractiveness of the evolving solution and the viability of the business model.

JTBD short circuits this process by defining and prioritizing upfront the desired outcomes the customer seeks. This data quickly exposes hidden segments of opportunity and unmet needs that can take months to uncover if teams jump too quickly into build and experiment mode.

Take Kroll Ontrack’s entry into the electronic evidence discovery market as an example. Its first two iterations of a minimum viable product failed to produce sufficient evidence that they were on the right track. Why? Their experiments failed to consider all aspects of the customer’s job-to-be-done. In fact, they ignored parts of the job completely. In addition, they optimized unimportant parts of the job at the expense of getting the underserved parts of the job done more effectively.  As a result, they had to rethink their problem assumptions, revisit their proposed solution, and start down a new test and learn pathway.

JTBD helps reduce the number of experiment iterations needed to validate the magnitude and prevalence of the problem and helps pinpoint more quickly the value customers place on a proposed solution. Working together, JTBD and lean innovation allow companies to isolate the most important desired outcomes upfront, design more targeted customer experiments, and more effectively validate solutions to significant problems. This results in shorter development cycle times while increasing the odds of innovation success.

Once Kroll Ontrack applied Jobs Theory and lean innovation together, they quickly got an awarding winning product to market. (see case study). This is the power of outcome-driven venturing. It adds science to the front-end of the innovation process.

Noel Sobelman is a Principal with Change Logic.  He works with corporate leaders to accelerate core business vitality while simultaneously building new-growth businesses. For the past 25 years, he has worked in the areas of growth strategy, innovation capability building, portfolio management, organization design, ecosystem development, and digital enablement. He is widely recognized for bringing a practical and applicable approach to companies looking to ignite change.

Tony Ulwick is the pioneer of jobs-to-be-done theory, the inventor of the Outcome-Driven Innovation® (ODI) process, and the founder of the strategy and innovation consulting firm Strategyn. He is the author of  Jobs to be Done: Theory to Practice (IDEA BITE PRESS, October 2016), “What Customers Want” (McGraw-Hill) and numerous articles in Harvard Business Review and Sloan Management Review.

 

Related Posts

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

Jobs-to-be-Done /

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

Strategy & Business Models /

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

“Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken

Jobs-to-be-Done /

“Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken

‹ “Beyond Scenario Planning” – An Interview with Daniel Erasmus › “Online Advertising is Changing – what you need to know to stay up to speed” – Claire Burdett
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar
  • “Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken
  • OP-ED: “Autopsy Of a Brand: Tesla” – George Tsakraklides
  • “The 5th P is Purpose” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “The CEO-as-Brand Era: How Leadership Ego is Fueling Tesla’s Meltdown” – Ilenia Vidili
  • “The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Questions for the New Year” – John Hagel
  • “Enlightened Management – An Interview with Gabriele Carboni”
  • “If you’re not thinking segments, you’re not thinking” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “Does Marketing Need Curtailment for the Sake of Sustainability?” – Philip Kotler
  • ‘Social profit orientation’ can help companies and nonprofits alike do more good in the world by Leonard L. Berry, Lerzan Aksoy, and Tracey Danaher
  • “Understanding Hallyu: The Impact of Korean Pop Culture” by Sanya Anand and David Seyheon Baek
  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Ethics and AI: Policies for Governance and Regulation” – Aryssa Yoon, Christian Sarkar, and Philip Kotler
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti
  • “ChatGPT could be a game-changer for marketers, but it won’t replace humans any time soon” – Omar H. Fares
  • “If Your Brand Comes Before Your Category, You’re Doing It Wrong” – Eddie Yoon, Nicolas Cole, Christopher Lochhead

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • March 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy