The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“Shifting from Persona to Person” – Matthew Hellman

“Shifting from Persona to Person” – Matthew Hellman

October 6, 2017

Introduction

We live in volatile and unpredictable times. When we think we’ve got one thing (a great job, a closed deal, the perfect product, the right strategy) figured out—our world changes, and we have to figure it out all over again.

Just like the erratic behavior of world order, so too are the forces that inform market demand, customer choices, and the strategies that drive our businesses forward. Coping and trying to survive (let alone thrive) in this environment is terrifying – whether you are leading a start-up or a global Fortune 500 company.

So how does one cope?

Traditionally, the foundations of marketing practice teach us that we should use data and market research to understand our customers’ buying behavior, preferences, demographics, and goals, and personify them into fictional clusters/personas. Marketers then leverage the principles behind the seven P’s (product, price, promotion, placement, packaging, positioning, people) to produce, market, and target their goods and services toward those generated personas.

This methodology works really well for companies producing products that meet a general basic need for a broad group of people. Procter & Gamble’s Tide Pods, for example, are targeted toward Millennials (~83.1MM people), a generation that generally seeks products that provide convenience, are energy-efficient, and in the words of a Tide ad, “provide excellent results with minimal time and effort.” It worked great for P&G, which now owns 78% share of a $7 billion market in the “single-pod” laundry detergent space.

It is clear that segmentation and persona creation are fantastic exercises, but these activities lack the ability to hone in on individual needs and desires for everyone individually.

Up against threats like those from technology, including word-of-mouth transmission (social media, T.V., internet) and online retailers like Amazon and eBay, customers have become savvier at understanding what they want, how much they want to pay for it, and where/how to buy it. This makes it harder than ever for companies to standardize offerings and marketing programs aimed at a general segment.

But what if we are making the process of coping with change too complicated? Moreover, do we really need to invest in expensive consulting teams, databases, and CRM tools to figure out how to humanize and understand our customers?

What if instead we treated customer interactions like team strategy meetings … thinking through ways to improve their company’s bottom line, increasing operational efficiency, becoming more competitive in the market?

I have spent the last year and a half helping to drive, improve, and enable our commercial strategy to do just that at GE Digital.

Commercial Strategy at GE Digital

At GE Digital, we are focused on transforming the way our customers operate their assets and run their businesses.  We are working to provide solutions that leverage sensors, predictive analytics, and machine learning to make their operations faster, predictive, and more intelligent. Our customers are both small and large, and span the globe – so we must tailor our offerings region by region, customer to customer, and individual to individual within the organization.

Our focus, was not to push product, but rather become fluent in our customer’s goals, strategies, and initiatives and help them achieve them in the best ways. So, we created a software and operational “consulting-like” salesforce. It focuses on becoming strategic advisors to our customers, leveraging GE’s core expertise around manufacturing, organizational digital transformation, knowledge of software, data science, and machine learning. We strive to help our customers improve overall business operations with software and services.

This new role for the salesperson shifts away from leading with features and benefits to higher value-add discussions about operational performance, and how GE’s applications and services may or may not support the outcome that any given customer wants to achieve.

We aim to put on our customers’ “glasses” to understand their world, their needs, their challenges, and in turn, translate those perspectives into strategy and actionable insights for management and key decision makers up and down their organization. When we do this, we are often able to drive higher impact for our customers, because we know the nuances of their problems and needs, and are able to align and apply the right solutions to them in the right way.

Like strategy and operational consultants, to better align their strategy for each customer, our account managers spend significant time thinking about their accounts: leveraging research, data, and tools to understand the company, the P&L they are looking to work with, and the individual organizational priorities and goals. Moreover, they look at each account as a multilayered organization made up of individual people – each with unique needs, desires, interests.

Just because a CEO’s goals, objectives, impressions, and behaviors are one way, doesn’t mean that their executive team or field engineers feel the same way. Our account managers tailor their approach and interactions for each individual across the customer’s organization to build relationships and influence appropriately.

Strategy Mapping

We use strategy mapping and strategic relationship mapping to improve knowledge, solution generation, and improve and influence customer relationships. This has dramatically helped us make this shift from product pusher to “trusted advisor.”

Strategy Mapping helps us understand a customer’s “story” from top to bottom in a logical way. It’s helpful for preparing for customer meetings, organizing imperatives, and thinking through how GE could help support the customer to achieve their goals. Moreover, it helps us understand what the customer wants and needs, where they spend their money, and how they work to achieve their goals. We essentially build out a personalized “persona” for each account.

There are four components to our strategic maps: Goal, Strategy, Initiative, and Barriers.

Goals

Goals are THE WHAT – What does the customer want to accomplish either from an activity (i.e. digital transformation) or from any other stated results/objectives (gather from annual reports, online research, networking, etc.)?

  • Goals should be specific, never vague. “Increase profits” is not a goal; it is a wish. $2.40 earnings per share is a goal.
  • Make sure the goals reflect all the major goals for the account or department. Too often we list the goals that only affect GE. To build credibility with executives it is important to discuss what is on their minds beyond GE.
  • For every goal confirm the owner of the goal, this helps as we think through relationship mapping (later on).

Strategy

Strategy is THE HOW – What are the plans, methods, or strategies by which the organization will meet their goals?

  • Every goal should have at least one strategy supporting it.
  • Strategies are often a statement of intent to be followed up with an initiative and with an owner.
  • Make sure the strategies reflect all the major strategies for the account or department. Too often we list the strategies that only affect GE. To build credibility with executives it is important to discuss what is on their minds beyond GE.

Initiative

Initiative defines the projects or initiatives that have been assigned by the customer with funds and personnel, to support their goals & strategies.

  • Initiatives should have a name, budget, assigned personnel and desired result. If all four are not identified then it is possible that it is just a stated direction or a “wish”.
  • Strategies lead to initiatives. Each initiative should connect to a strategy and contribute to a goal.

Barriers

Barriers anticipate what might restrain or obstruct progress in reaching the organization’s goals or objectives.

  • Barriers are important to GE. Our solutions overcome these barriers and aid a company in achieving their goals. The more barriers we discover and gain agreement on with the prospect increases the perceived value of our solution.
  • We also identify major barriers that are not addressed by GE.

Strategy maps are ever evolving, as the organization develops and changes, so too do the strategies, goals, initiatives, and barriers that customers care and think about. Our account managers continuously keep these up to date, and refer to them even with customers to strategize and think through how to help customers achieve the outcomes they care about.

Strategic Relationship Mapping

Strategic relationship mapping helps us understand the account’s organization and key decision makers, critical in determining who, and how best, to influence up and down the organization.

Mapping helps us drive strategy around relationships, interactions, and time management. We want to better understand who we are working with inside the organization, define what they like and dislike, and understand on an interpersonal level what are their trigger points.

To do this, we divide our strategic relationship maps into two areas: Stakeholder Maps and Power maps:

Stakeholder Maps

Stakeholder maps sketch out the entire organization at large (not just the organization or key decision makers that influence a specific opportunity). We outline individuals at all levels of the organization from CEO on down to plant management, and within each box we categorize and codify our relationship and history with that individual.

When codifying each individual, we rate their influence at the organization, what their relationship development priority is (how important it is to expand or improve our relationship with this account); adaptability (how does this person behave in the face of change); strength of relationship with this account; and coverage (how much time do we spend with this customer, who has interacted with this customer, and who owns the relationship).

We then integrate these into a map to show where people fall within the organization. Stakeholder maps help account managers track important players within the customer organization. They are also an essential tool for helping senior GE leaders prepare for customer meetings. They help them anticipate what to expect and to tailor their messages.

This process is especially powerful when preparing for a potentially volatile meeting where I needed to convert an avid detractor into a supporter. These maps help us avoid pitfalls and sensitive areas, and move the relationship to a better place.

Relationship maps help us understand where our reps spend their time:

  • Are we spending too much time with “non-influencers”?
  • Do we have a silo-focus (do we only have deep knowledge and relationships with one department) with little coverage elsewhere?
  • In the cases where we don’t have a supporter or “coach” identified, we need to build our development plant to create some.

Power Maps

Power Maps are for active sales opportunities. We use five key metrics to understand where key stakeholders within an account fall regarding a specific opportunity.

Similar to the stakeholder maps, we use power maps to understand at the account level, who the key influencers and decision makers are on a specific opportunity. We outline in these maps the role that the sales person believes he / she will play in this specific buying decision.

The number rating is the same as the stakeholder maps, but the meaning is slightly different. Is this person an advisor & coach on this decision, will they actually vote for GE behind closed doors?

Once each player in the decision is codified, they are placed into a power map, which resemble organization charts.

Like strategy maps and account plans, relationship maps are never really “complete.” We spend time reviewing and thinking about new ways to leverage data, partners, relationships and other resources to better improve our potential for winning. These tools are integral to our marketing and operations teams. They support account-based marketing, and help us deliver proposals more quickly. They help us provide seamless delivery. And, they support a continuous effort to improve customer behavior in the ways that matter the most to them.

Conclusions

Planning and research doesn’t guarantee success, but we find that when we shift our thinking from personas to persons, and focus our energy on creating the best possible experience for each individual within our account’s organization (each, with unique and ever-evolving interests and needs), we (and our customers) win bigger and win more often.

GE Digital’s account management strategy works for us now, but it requires resiliency, effort, innovation, organization, and the ability to pivot and shift strategy when we realize change is necessary.

I believe every company can be successful so long as they stay customer-centric. They must remember to see through their customer’s “lenses,” or to view the customer’s world through their eyes. Then it is possible to craft solutions that help customers achieve their desired outcomes. When they succeed, we succeed. By connecting the dots for each customer on a personal level, you can reduce the amount of chaos your customers experience, and share in the successes you help create for them.

Matthew Hellman, Head of strategy for GE Digital, the Americas, and Asia Pacific

Related Posts

“The Ten Deadly Marketing Sins — Reimagined for the Regenerative Era” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

B2B Marketing /

“The Ten Deadly Marketing Sins — Reimagined for the Regenerative Era” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

Customer Engagement /

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

Decision Making /

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

‹ “Capitalizing On Social Media Investments” – Christine Moorman › “Market Segmentation: Still the Bedrock of Commercial Success” – Malcolm McDonald
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “The Ten Deadly Marketing Sins — Reimagined for the Regenerative Era” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “AI Destroys Months of Work, Fabricates Data, and Lies About It—Like a Human” – David Sehyeon Baek
  • “Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar
  • “Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken
  • OP-ED: “Autopsy Of a Brand: Tesla” – George Tsakraklides
  • “The 5th P is Purpose” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “The CEO-as-Brand Era: How Leadership Ego is Fueling Tesla’s Meltdown” – Ilenia Vidili
  • “The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Questions for the New Year” – John Hagel
  • “Enlightened Management – An Interview with Gabriele Carboni”
  • “If you’re not thinking segments, you’re not thinking” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “Does Marketing Need Curtailment for the Sake of Sustainability?” – Philip Kotler
  • ‘Social profit orientation’ can help companies and nonprofits alike do more good in the world by Leonard L. Berry, Lerzan Aksoy, and Tracey Danaher
  • “Understanding Hallyu: The Impact of Korean Pop Culture” by Sanya Anand and David Seyheon Baek
  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Ethics and AI: Policies for Governance and Regulation” – Aryssa Yoon, Christian Sarkar, and Philip Kotler
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • March 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy