The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“The Elements of Value” – An Interview with Jamie Cleghorn

“The Elements of Value” – An Interview with Jamie Cleghorn

April 11, 2018

Jamie Cleghorn is a partner with Bain’s Customer Strategy & Marketing and Technology practices.  With Eric Almquist and Lori Sherer, he’s the co-author of the ground-breaking Harvard Business Review article on elements of value in B2B markets. The Value Pyramid, as they term the concept,  categorizes the elements of customer value into the levels of a pyramid, with those providing more objective value at the base and those that offer more subjective value higher up. 

How did you come up with the Value Pyramid?  

My colleague Eric Almquist came up with it originally. He’s been in consulting for about 40 years, and he’s really been the driver in taking advanced techniques to measure customer behavior out of the academic sphere and into the mainstream. For decades he’s been examining why customers buy.

We’ve developed two separate pyramids of value – one for B2C, and the second for B2B.

The elements of value at the base are the more common objective criteria we’re all familiar with.  It is the higher-level, subjective elements that companies often fail to pay enough attention to.


Elements of Value: The The B2C Value Pyramid

What’s interesting is that the difference between business-to-business (B2B) and consumer (B2C) decisions are not cut-and-dried. Of course B2B sellers need to optimize prices, meet specifications, comply with regulations, and follow ethical practices. Many organizations have B2B procurement teams that evaluate vendors and run total cost-of-ownership models to ensure that rational, quantifiable criteria around price and performance shape their analyses. But those criteria are simply the table stakes.

Elements of Value: The B2B Value Pyramid

We also find that as B2B offerings become more commoditized, then the subjective, personal concerns of the business customer become increasingly important. Our research shows that with some purchases, considerations such as whether a product can enhance the buyer’s reputation or reduce anxiety play a large role. Businesses that ignore this are going to lose out.

So how does an organization decide which elements matter the most?

For the B2B Value Pyramid,  we find that the base of the pyramid are essentially the table stakes: meeting specifications at an acceptable price in compliance with regulations while abiding by ethical standards.

Above that are the functional elements of value, which address companies’ economic or product performance needs, such as cost reduction and scalability.

Most B2B companies focus their energy on these functional elements.

Above that, it’s about making it easier to do business; some provide purely objective types of value, by, say, increasing a customer’s productivity (time savings, reduced effort) or improving its operational performance (simplification, organization). Now we meet the first set of elements involving subjective elements. They include things that enhance relationships between parties, such as a good cultural fit and a seller’s commitment to the customer organization.

The elements at the next level provide additional types of subjective value, addressing individual buyers’ priorities, whether they are personal (reduced anxiety, appealing design and aesthetics) or career related (increased marketability or network expansion.)  Here the elements of value address highly emotional concerns. A fear of failure often nags at buyers who spend large amounts of money and make decisions that may affect revenues or many employees.

Finally, at the top of the pyramid are the inspirational elements of value: those that improve the customer’s vision of the future, provide hope for the future of the organization or the individual buyers, or enhance a company’s social responsibility.

The Value Pyramid framework helps companies address that broader challenge of intangibles. The more emotional elements at the middle and upper levels have traditionally been difficult to isolate and quantify and, therefore, harder to implement. But the battle for differentiation is shifting toward these less transactional aspects. By using modern survey techniques and statistical analysis to quantify all the elements on a consistent basis, leaders can learn what customers truly value and which aspects of an offering merit investment. Executives can bring scientific rigor to their decision making.

What steps should organizations take to get started?

When companies conduct a full elements value analysis, they are often surprised to find big gaps between their self-assessments and customer opinions of the overall experience of buying and using their offerings.  This opens the door for real improvement. Here are five steps:

  1. Benchmark your company’s value proposition against your competitors’ by surveying your customers on how your products and services perform relative to rival offerings on the non-table-stakes elements.
  2. Talk with customers to understand their experience. Conduct follow-up interviews to explore their needs and sources of satisfaction and frustration, and the compromises they make in using your products and services. Since many people can be involved in buying decisions, especially at larger organizations, it’s worth mapping who is on the buying team, who has influence on it, and the different priorities and sources of value for each.
  3. Imagine ways to increase value for customers. Once you have identified a set of elements warranting attention, hold daylong ideation sessions to determine which core elements to focus on first.
  4. Refine, test, and learn. Assess the best ideas from the ideation session by discussing their appeal with customers and your firm’s ability to deliver on them.
  5. Apply the acid test. After introducing enhancements, reevaluate how you stack up against competitors, ideally by rerunning the original research. Objective follow-up analysis is important to ensure that your initiatives have actually delivered the value customers are seeking.

We then encourage leaders to ask three questions:

  • How does our value proposition compare with competitors?
  • How do we bridge the gaps and seize opportunities to differentiate in the market?
  • Can we launch a minimum viable product without breaking the bank?

How does the Value Pyramid relate to the Net Promoter Score (NPS)?

Of course it’s highly co-related – they came out of the same practice area at Bain.  The Value Pyramid can be viewed as the driver of the elements that create a positive NPS.

Let’s look at the the top of the Value Pyramid – what do companies have to do there to stay relevant?

Increasingly companies have to look at social-impact and inspirational values because the market, the customers demand it.  One of the thing that we see that value is transient.  Buy decisions are made by individuals, and as millennials increase their buying power, we see them bringing their values to the table.  What was cutting edge yesterday is not what it is today.  So there’s a constant race.

Since writing these articles, what new insights have you gained?

We see that Value Pyramid being used in terms of innovation as well. Companies are interested in building the next offer – and the Value Pyramid is a technology that helps them get there. Or making investment decisions.  There are all sorts of financial management decisions that can be made based on the Value Pyramid.

Thanks.

INTERVIEW by Christian Sarkar

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSaveSaveSave

Related Posts

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

B2B Marketing /

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

B2C Marketing /

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

“Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso

Customer Engagement /

“Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso

‹ “Data and Trust:
 4 Painful Lessons from Facebook” – Frank Grillo and Mark Blessington › “The Value Realization Road Map: How to Ensure Customer Satisfaction” – Javed Matin
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar
  • “Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken
  • OP-ED: “Autopsy Of a Brand: Tesla” – George Tsakraklides
  • “The 5th P is Purpose” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “The CEO-as-Brand Era: How Leadership Ego is Fueling Tesla’s Meltdown” – Ilenia Vidili
  • “The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Questions for the New Year” – John Hagel
  • “Enlightened Management – An Interview with Gabriele Carboni”
  • “If you’re not thinking segments, you’re not thinking” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “Does Marketing Need Curtailment for the Sake of Sustainability?” – Philip Kotler
  • ‘Social profit orientation’ can help companies and nonprofits alike do more good in the world by Leonard L. Berry, Lerzan Aksoy, and Tracey Danaher
  • “Understanding Hallyu: The Impact of Korean Pop Culture” by Sanya Anand and David Seyheon Baek
  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Ethics and AI: Policies for Governance and Regulation” – Aryssa Yoon, Christian Sarkar, and Philip Kotler
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti
  • “ChatGPT could be a game-changer for marketers, but it won’t replace humans any time soon” – Omar H. Fares
  • “If Your Brand Comes Before Your Category, You’re Doing It Wrong” – Eddie Yoon, Nicolas Cole, Christopher Lochhead

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • March 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy