The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“When Logic meets Intuition: The Squircle” – an interview with Francis Cholle

“When Logic meets Intuition: The Squircle” – an interview with Francis Cholle

July 21, 2020

Francis Cholle is an international business consultant, best-selling author, and engaging speaker. He helps companies rethink business in ways that conventional strategic management cannot. His clients are major, mid-size, emerging firms, including global powerhouses across a wide variety of industries such as beauty, luxury, pharmaceuticals, communications, media, and information technology.  Cholle is the founder of The Human Company, and the author of several books on intuition and business creativity. His latest book, SQUIRCLE: A New Way to THINK for a NEW WORLD, was released earlier this month.

What is a SQUIRCLE? And, what made you write this book now? 

SQUIRCLE is a science-based model designed to enhance the way we think. In a more and more complex world, we need to rely on a deeper intelligence to make good decisions.  SQUIRCLE recognizes the importance of our rational minds (SQUARE) while honoring the natural insights from our intuition (CIRCLE). Understanding how to apply both leads to life-changing tools that will create success with teams, clients’ problem solving or complex decision making. It is designed for business and all aspects of life.

We are all SQUARES.  What attributes do you assign to the SQUARE versus the CIRCLE?

Allow me to add a precision here. Yes, we are all educated to develop a SQUARE approach to life, that is to think logically and to rely on rationality and facts in order to make good decisions.  But there is more to us than what can be understood through logic. Emotions, inspirations, intuitions, sensations all live beyond logic. These not only make us uniquely human but they enable our creativity and agility and directly connect us to our bodies, to nature in us.

SQUARE symbolizes the logical mind: deduction and induction, information and evaluation. It is rational, dependable, stable, predictable, and orderly. But it is limiting. This is why we have arts in order to stimulate our imagination, sports to engage our bodies, games to encourage learning and risk taking. Our feelings and hunches help us engage with the ambiguity and complexity of life. They provide the necessary level of subtlety in order to go beyond binary logic, to think deeply. Noble Prize in physics Niels Bohr’s famous quote illustrates this point perfectly: “No, no. You’re not thinking, you’re just being logical.”

CIRCLE symbolizes intuition: emergence, fluidity and unpredictability. It is non-linear, inclusive and adaptive. Like nature it is complex and creative, holistic and infinite. This is why CIRCLE is so important in a time of increasing uncertainty and so necessary to shift from our exploitative relationship with nature to adopting a regenerative model. This is what every company has to integrate in its management culture (disruption) and business practices (CSR).

Why have we killed the CIRCLE in our lives?  How do we free the CIRCLE?

We have alienated the CIRCLE in our lives by misjudging science. We have progressively assigned science a role that it never claimed: to give us certitudes. The purpose of science is to produce knowledge. It remains our responsibility to decide what to do with this knowledge. But it is so much more comfortable to implicitly believe that what’s rational is right and what’s not rational wrong. That allows us to shy away from responsibilities and gives us the illusion of control over life’s and nature’s unpredictability.

To illustrate this point. Let’s talk about big data. Today data management systems provide a wealth of useful knowledge. But to identify the piece of data that is key for my marketing strategy requires more than linear analysis. Experience, sensitivity, anticipation, and intuition will at some point or another have to play a big role as well. It’s true for consumer insights but also for economic science and financial investing. Ironically these very human aspects of ourselves—squashed and considered as something unreliable and dangerous in our dominant Square culture—are pretty much everything that AI experts are attempting yet challenged to replicate with technology! The good news though is that this centuries-old bias is at odds with the latest scientific research, led by great scientists like Dr. Gerd Gigerenzer, Director of Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the University of Potsdam, or Director of the Center of Brain and Creativity at University of Southern California and neuroscientist, Pr. António Damásio. The first researched the importance of heuristics for reliable decision making and better adaptation, the latter the importance of emotions in our capacity to anticipate and perceive decisive nuances in complex situations.

Now let me answer your other question about freeing the Circle.

First let’s remember Circle (intuition) is always one. If it’s not “freed” it’s because we simply don’t pay attention to it. Few actually do. Why ? Because, faithful to a dominant Square  most of us still expect intuition to tell us what’s right from what’s wrong. I keep reading in respectable magazines titles like: “Should you follow your intuition” – “When to trust your intuition?” This is not the function of intuition to tell us what to do, unless we connect with a gut instinct in a situation of emergency. Intuition is more like a search engine that reaches places where logic cannot go. It brings back clues that enrich our perspectives and that don’t necessarily make sense; but it doesn’t mean that these clues are void of value. Therein again lies our responsibility to decide what to do with this non logical information.

So to “free” the circle requires simply to become aware of our bias for a dominant Square to purposefully undo it so that you can become receptive of your intuitive sense. Ways to do this ? Simply connect with your breath. Pay attention to the movements of your diaphragm. It will bring you right away to the present moment. Similarly to focus on one of your five senses will get you out of mental chatter and bring you stillness. For example, sitting at your desk, sense the objects you touch (your pen, the surface of your desk, the keys of your laptop) and be receptive to how this makes you feel.

What do you mean when you say let go of your strategy and outcomes?

I wrote this in the context of a serious game we have all executives at our global clients play. The SQUIRCLE Game mirrors very faithfully what business is about today. The objective of the game is to help executives develop a new skillset to adapt and succeed in a VUCA (Volatile Uncertain Complex Ambiguous) environment. What the SQUIRCLE Game makes very clear in less than 20 minutes is the following. To overcome a complex challenge you cannot think like an algorithm (map out exhaustively all scenarios, compare them and choose the optimum path). Actually it is not only useless it is also banning you from accessing a deeper intelligence that is necessary to constantly adapt and finally succeed. However once you give up the command control mode, you have access to your natural ability for creative adaptation and get ahead. I have systematically seen groups succeed once they—individually and collectively—surrender control over the process and give up their attachment to the outcomes.

This is exactly what SQUIRCLE is designed for. The model shows an actionable path for people to give up the dominance of the SQUARE over the CIRCLE, because it compromises our ability to thrive in a VUCA world. It makes clear and actionable that when we relinquish control over the process by letting go of strategy and outcomes, a deeper intelligence emerges at an individual and group level. This deeper intelligence, called intuitive intelligence, guides the group of participants through the complexity of the challenge all the way to its resolution.

Can you give us a business example or two?

Over the years, I have worked with a number of companies that had to reinvent their business models due to disruption by pure digital players, in industries like sports and entertainment or media publishing, for instance. These were very tough situations: free fall in sales and growing losses, due to broken business models, a disrupted industry and a very tough economic environment. These were large companies with billion-dollar top lines, operating offices on different continents. Nevertheless under the pressure of their burning platforms, they were able to move from operating cruise liners to steering speed boats, taking risks, making highly strategic decisions within a few hours, seizing new opportunities, changing organizational dynamics from hierarchical to entrepreneurial. To make this possible, the CEO had to accept that she had no clarity about the future but that it shouldn’t hamper her ability to lead her direct reports, inspire her people, make decisions and take actions. One accepted to say that the “vision was the reinvention” and that the culture had to change from being financially driven with quarterly reports ruling their calendars to becoming entrepreneurial and willing to experiment and take more risks, in the absence of a clear strategy and roadmap. To get there they practiced SQUIRCLE Game on a regular basis; actually each time their Executive Committee was meeting.

I also remember interviewing a senior executive at one of the largest global pharmaceutical companies. He was running the portfolio of all over-the-counter drugs. Because it was the least strategic and least profitable part of the company’s portfolio, his bosses were not paying much attention to his way of driving the business. So he and his team felt a certain independence and developed a real autonomy. Unlike the rest of the offices, they painted theirs in bright colors, had a new logo designed, worked different flexible hours to accommodate all personal situations. Over four consecutive years, they grew their top line by 40% although the CEO admitted that they had repeatedly made mistakes in elaborating their strategy. Yet what saved them was their ability to systematically pivot quickly. The pressure they felt coming from the C-suite was low, they became rather autonomous thinkers and entrepreneurial doers. That’s how the CEO explained their success in spite of the systematic strategic misjudgments.

Post-Covid, how do we regain Nature and make it central to our lives?

This is the fundamental objective of SQUIRCLE: to reconnect us—through intuition and instinct—with the intelligence of nature in us. I am a firm believer that culture eats strategy for breakfast. This is why it all starts with people. Once professionals and individuals are used to SQUIRCLE to solve problems and make decisions tapping their natural abilities, we will have won our bet. One decision at a time, we will surely move towards a more innovative and more sustainable future. 
What is the SQUIRCLE test?

It is based on a proven assessment that helped 250,000 senior executives and students at some of the most successful companies and most prestigious business schools in the world. It gives respondents insights into their preference for either a SQUARE or a CIRCLE approach to situations and decisions.

The purpose of the SQUIRCLE test is not to assign you to a specific profile or category. It is meant to foster self-reflection and promote open discussion with others. Whether your preference is for a SQUARE or a CIRCLE approach, we all need to recognize:

  • the importance of CIRCLE in re-inventing our organizations, our modes of leadership and decision-making,
  • the great contribution of SQUARE in analyzing, bringing facts and frameworks of reference, as long as it doesn’t become dominant, like an ideology that suppresses critical and creative thinking.

Based on a decade of empirical research, we can say that by a large majority people favor a SQUARE approach. So it makes a big difference once people recognize their inclination and can better appreciate others’ difference or similarity. It’s not how many CIRCLE people you have in your organization, that matters. It is how well you understand and support those with a CIRCLE preference. SQUIRCLE is really for everyone.

What’s next for you and for SQUIRCLE?

I believe the first person affected by a new book is its author, especially when it’s a book that catalyzes a personal evolution. To write a book—even as short and simple as SQUIRCLE—is always a transformative process for me. So first I am going to let it do its positive work on my mind as I hope it will on many other people.

Nevertheless I anticipate some public speaking engagements, a large interest from the media, requests from CEOs and HR Executives. Based on approximately 50 first readers’ feedback, I think people will feel inspired by SQUIRCLE. It is as simple as it gets. Everybody can understand how SQUIRCLE works. Regardless of their levels of education and backgrounds, everyone can use it. This is why I am passionate about sharing SQUIRCLE via a team of strong certified coaches and an online platform filled with information, creative content, training and exercises, all available at: SQUIRCLEACADEMY.com.

Thanks for your time, Francis.

INTERVIEW by Christian Sarkar.

Related Posts

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

B2B Marketing /

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

B2C Marketing /

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

“Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam

Big Data /

“Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam

‹ “The Rise of 5 New-Normal Lifestyles” – Philip Kotler › “Consumer Boycotts: An Essential Method of Peaceful Protest” – Philip Kotler
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar
  • “Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken
  • OP-ED: “Autopsy Of a Brand: Tesla” – George Tsakraklides
  • “The 5th P is Purpose” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “The CEO-as-Brand Era: How Leadership Ego is Fueling Tesla’s Meltdown” – Ilenia Vidili
  • “The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Questions for the New Year” – John Hagel
  • “Enlightened Management – An Interview with Gabriele Carboni”
  • “If you’re not thinking segments, you’re not thinking” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “Does Marketing Need Curtailment for the Sake of Sustainability?” – Philip Kotler
  • ‘Social profit orientation’ can help companies and nonprofits alike do more good in the world by Leonard L. Berry, Lerzan Aksoy, and Tracey Danaher
  • “Understanding Hallyu: The Impact of Korean Pop Culture” by Sanya Anand and David Seyheon Baek
  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Ethics and AI: Policies for Governance and Regulation” – Aryssa Yoon, Christian Sarkar, and Philip Kotler
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti
  • “ChatGPT could be a game-changer for marketers, but it won’t replace humans any time soon” – Omar H. Fares
  • “If Your Brand Comes Before Your Category, You’re Doing It Wrong” – Eddie Yoon, Nicolas Cole, Christopher Lochhead

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • March 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy