The Marketing Journal
  • About
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Book Reviews
  • Views
  • Subscribe
“Is This Ad Political?” – Karen Puckett and Mark Blessington

“Is This Ad Political?” – Karen Puckett and Mark Blessington

February 8, 2018

Is it possible for marketers to avoid politics in today’s highly social world? We explore this thorny question by examining Super Bowl LII commercials and applying the concept of brand beneficence.

Tide’s Super Bowl Ad

Adweek’s consensus choice for best ad during Super Bowl LII was “It’s a Tide ad.” The ad is actually a four-spot sequence. The first 45-second ad ran in the first quarter. Then there were three 15-second commercials for each subsequent quarter.

The first ad starts like a traditional car ad, with a sporty sedan accelerating along a mountain road. The ad cuts to the driver, actor David Harbour, who drones “Yeah, just your typical Super Bowl car ad.” He pauses, looks to the camera, smirks a bit and asks “Right?”

Then the ad cuts to a bar scene and Harbour says “Or, a hilarious beer ad” and laughs with his friends as a full bottle of beer slides past him off the bar and crashes on the floor. The third skit has Harbour in heaven, in triplicate, and he says skeptically “Or, whatever ad this is” and whispers “Whatever.”

In the fourth skit Harbour is dressed as a rancher. He turns to the camera and drawls “But, it’s a Tide ad.” Then five more humorous skits repeat the punchline with variations. In the tenth scene, Harbour is sitting with “his” family (in clean clothes) and he asks quizzically “So, does this make every Super Bowl ad a Tide ad?”

With this conclusion, the Tide ad hijacks every Super Bowl ad. If actors in an ad are wearing clean clothes, then they were probably washed in Tide. If they have dirty clothes, then they need Tide. In short, every ad is about Tide (even if it isn’t).

The top creative directors for Saatchi & Saatchi (Campopiano and Bickler) both describe the ad strategy as rooted in the brand’s iconic market position. Another aspect of the Tide ad strategy, as explained by P&G’s North American fabric care brand director (Miletic), was to support Tide’s new scent, new stain-cleaning line, and new cleaning effectiveness claims.

Yet some viewers saw an embedded political message in the Tide ads. For example, the following morning Jake Novak, a senior columnist for CNBC, wrote: “This genius Super Bowl stunt is a clear representation of our current political climate: Donald Trump is effectively running the ‘It’s a Tide ad’ presidency.” Is it possible that P&G was ever so subtly criticizing the Trump presidency?

Further support for the political interpretation of the Tide commercial comes from the fact that P&G persistently airs political ads. Despite waves of criticism, the company remains committed to using its corporate brand to support the anti-bias movement.

The point here is that any ad can be interpreted as political. The more social attention the ad attracts, the more likely it is to be both lauded and lambasted from multiple political perspectives. If a brand “avoids” politics, it is vulnerable to being pigeonholed as “conservative.” If a brand takes a stand on a liberal social issue, it obviously exposes itself to being labeled “liberal.”

Were Most Super Bowl LII Ads “Tame”?

Most early reviews of Super Bowl LII ads described them as tame or decidedly devoid of overt political messaging. For example, Sapna Maheshwari for the New York Times wrote an article: “Advertisers Eschew Politics for Humor in Super Bowl Commercials.”

But did a year of highly divisive and near-daily political turmoil make the Super Bowl LII ads seem less political than last year? Did many of them contain political messages, but we were just not as responsive this year as we were last year?

Charles Taylor, a marketing professor at Villanova University, thinks 20% of all Super Bowl LII ads featured causes, compared with just 6 percent last year. Here are some examples: The T-Mobile ad celebrated diversity. The Kia Forte ad was a subtle jab at the practice of stating obvious falsehoods as truth (similar to the Tide ads). The Groupon ad was a not-so-subtle attack on greed. The Go-GURT ad poked fun at several conservative political themes. Toyota highlighted the Paralympics. The Budweiser commercial spoke to answering the call for disaster relief.

While many of the ads emphasized humor, that does not necessarily make them apolitical. A case in point is provided by late night comedy. This political humor eases the day’s angst stemming from political discord. The difference between late night comedy and the Super Bowl ads may best be described on a continuum of political aggressiveness. Anchoring one end you have no-holds-barred political commentary. The next level down you have political humor such as latenight comedy. Off to the other end of the continuum are ads with subtle political nuances and undertones that are easily downplayed by the sponsor and often missed by the casual observer.

Brand Beneficence

Another way to think about the difference between Super Bowl LI and LII ads is this: Over the course of a year, political and social justice messaging from corporations has become more of a norm than an exception.

In Philip Kotler’s six-step branding model, the last step is to answer the question: “Does the brand serve well the person and the society?”

Kotler refers to this as “brand beneficence.” Companies increasingly see that establishing and conveying a brand’s higher purpose is what it takes to build long-term brand equity, goodwill, and profitability.

One indication of the importance of the brand beneficence concept, or creating meaningful connections between brands and social issues, is the very high popularity of this Kotler article on brand-activism.

Some companies inject social issues into their marketing as a tool for generating emotional reactions among viewers. Consumers are increasingly alert to and negatively triggered by such tactics. The Martin Luther King Super Bowl LII ad by Dodge may be an example. While GM’s effort may have been totally nested within the spirit of brand beneficence, consumer reactions were mixed. Perhaps the final scene’s jump shift to a soldier hugging their child in the airport was too much and pushed viewers to question GM’s authenticity. Was the ad about GM’s commitment to fighting racial injustice, or was it just about pulling heartstrings to drive short-term truck sales? Many concluded it was the latter.

Another advantage behind taking a decisive stand on a social issue is that a company can readily anticipate and prepare for the risks. For example, P&G can study the world of “anti-anti-bias” and prepare for pushbacks and counter attacks. This is far better than pretending you can avoid politics, and then find yourself in damage control mode as your brand is attacked as conservative, uncaring, detached, or “whatever” – as Harbour joked in the Tide ad.

So, Was this Article Political?

The simple answer is yes. In today’s world it is nearly impossible for marketers to avoid political, social issues. The very act of avoiding politics is a political act. One of the most difficult challenges facing CMOs today is helping the senior team come to this realization: they can’t avoid politics, so they need to find a social issue or a related set of social issues that mesh inseparably with the long-term essence of the company. Anything less is not only a lost opportunity, it is an exposure to a significant and avoidable risk.

Karen Puckett is the President and Chief Executive Officer at Harte Hanks.

Mark Blessington is a sales and marketing consultant at Mark Blessington Inc, and is the author of four books.

Related Posts

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

Advertising /

“Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler

“Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam

Analytics /

“Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

B2C Marketing /

“Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar

‹ “The Customer Culture Imperative: Is Marketing Destined to Lead a Better World?” – Linden Brown and Chris L. Brown › “Myth versus Reality in Retail Today” – Frank Grillo and Karl Hellman
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Posts

  • “Technology and the Common Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Cultural Presence: The Social Function of Milan Design Week” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “Wicked Problems” – An Interview with Philip Kotler and Christian Sarkar
  • “Dragon proofing your legacy brand” – Grant McCracken
  • OP-ED: “Autopsy Of a Brand: Tesla” – George Tsakraklides
  • “The 5th P is Purpose” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “The CEO-as-Brand Era: How Leadership Ego is Fueling Tesla’s Meltdown” – Ilenia Vidili
  • “The Future of Marketing is the Quest for Good” – Christian Sarkar and Philip Kotler
  • “Questions for the New Year” – John Hagel
  • “Enlightened Management – An Interview with Gabriele Carboni”
  • “If you’re not thinking segments, you’re not thinking” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “Does Marketing Need Curtailment for the Sake of Sustainability?” – Philip Kotler
  • ‘Social profit orientation’ can help companies and nonprofits alike do more good in the world by Leonard L. Berry, Lerzan Aksoy, and Tracey Danaher
  • “Understanding Hallyu: The Impact of Korean Pop Culture” by Sanya Anand and David Seyheon Baek
  • “Go-to-Market (GTM): A New Definition” – Karthi Ratnam
  • “Jobs-to-be-Done for Government” – Anthony Ulwick
  • “The Power of Superconsumers” – Christopher Lochhead, Eddie Yoon, & Katrina Kirsch
  • “Zoom Out/Zoom In – Making It Personal” – John Hagel
  • “Regeneration or Extinction?” – a discussion with Philip Kotler, Christian Sarkar, and Enrico Foglia
  • “Climate scientists: concept of net zero is a dangerous trap” – James Dyke, Robert Watson, and Wolfgang Knorr
  • “The allure of the ad-lib: New research identifies why people prefer spontaneity in entertainment” – Jacqueline Rifkin and Katherine Du
  • “What is ‘ethical AI’ and how can companies achieve it?” by Dennis Hirsch and Piers Norris Turner
  • “How the US military used magazines to target ‘vulnerable’ groups with recruiting ads” – Jeremiah Favara
  • “Ethics and AI: Policies for Governance and Regulation” – Aryssa Yoon, Christian Sarkar, and Philip Kotler
  • “Product Feature Prioritization —How to Align on the Right List” – Bob Pennisi
  • “The Community Value Pyramid” – Christian Sarkar, Philip Kotler, Enrico Foglia
  • “Next Practices in Museum Experience Design” – Barbara Dal Corso
  • “What does ESG mean?” – Luciana Echazú and Diego C. Nocetti
  • “ChatGPT could be a game-changer for marketers, but it won’t replace humans any time soon” – Omar H. Fares
  • “If Your Brand Comes Before Your Category, You’re Doing It Wrong” – Eddie Yoon, Nicolas Cole, Christopher Lochhead

Categories

  • Advertising
  • AI
  • Analytics
  • B2B Marketing
  • B2C Marketing
  • Big Data
  • Book Reviews
  • Brand Activism
  • Branding
  • Category Design
  • Community
  • Content Marketing
  • COVID-19
  • Creativity
  • Customer Culture
  • Customer Engagement
  • Customer Experience
  • Dark Marketing
  • Decision Making
  • Design
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecosystems & Platforms
  • Ethics
  • Go to Market
  • Innovation
  • Internet of Things
  • Jobs-to-be-Done
  • Leadership
  • Manipulation
  • Marketing Technology
  • Markets & Segmentation
  • Meaning
  • Metrics & Outcomes
  • Millennials
  • Mobile Marketing
  • Non Profit Marketing
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Peace Marketing
  • Privacy
  • Product Marketing
  • Regeneration
  • Regenerative Marketing
  • Research
  • Retail
  • Risk & Reputation
  • Sales
  • Services Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Strategy & Business Models
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • March 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016

Back to Top

© 2016-19 The Marketing Journal and the individual author(s). All Rights Reserved
Produced by: Double Loop Marketing LLC
By using this site, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to the use of cookies, our privacy policy, and our terms of use.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy